Don’t Just STOP SOPA: Fix It!

The issues related to the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA) are not as simple or black-and-white as many individuals and organizations are portraying them. There is consensus that online piracy is a problem that must be addressed, as well as general agreement that some kind of law is necessary. There are substantive – and important – differences, however, with respect to what the law should include and how it should be enforced. Rather than engendering unproductive hysteria through grand standing, dramatic (but hollow) gestures and rhetoric, leaders in both the private and public sectors would better serve their stakeholders (and themselves) by working together to develop a viable solution.

===//===

Cyberspace is full of "stop SOPA" posts today – many from people who probably had no idea what SOPA was yesterday, and probably still have an extremely limited understanding of the proposed legislation and its related issues.

I've been following the SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect Intellectual Property Act) stories since last fall, and the issues are not as black-and-white as many people are portraying them. More importantly, we must recognize that there are HUGE vested interests on both sides of the issue, and NO ONE's motivations are pure. People shouldn’t let themselves be manipulated by the drama and rhetoric - or especially the powerful players who have taken strong stands. They should educate themselves and then decide.

Everyone generally agrees digital piracy is a problem. Where things get sticky is that there’s no clear consensus on the best approaches to solving it. I would venture to say that both proponents and opponents of SOPA and PIPA agree that some version of these laws is necessary. Can they be improved? Yes. Should they be stopped? I don't think so. Leaders – both in government and in business – have to try to look past their vested interests to determine a viable solution.

The legislation can - and should - be fixed now. Neither the House (SOPA) nor Senate (PIPA) versions of the proposed law are anywhere close to a done deal, so I don't see what everyone is so up in arms about. And all the political grand standing – especially by technology organizations – seems unnecessarily hysterical and counteproductive. If there's consensus that we need to do something about piracy (and there is), and the dispute is over *how,* then that's where energy and attention should be focused. In other words, rather than trying to STOP SOPA, we should focus our energies on trying to FIX it.

Many of us claim to be tired of all the negativity in politics and the lack of leadership in both the private and public sectors. Yet countless folks have drunk the “they’re trying to break the internet” Kool-Aid and blindly jumped on the “Stop SOPA” bandwagon. In this area as in others, shouldn’t we stop emphasizing what we're against and focus on what we're for? Shouldn’t we move from problems to solutions, and focus on collaborating rather than fighting?

-  Courtney Shelton Hunt, PhD

PS - I have been working on a Digital Era Food for Thought (DEFFT) post about SOPA (and PIPA) since last November, but because news breaks almost constantly, I haven’t been able to finalize it! I’ll polish up the current draft for folks who want to better understand the issues, players, and ongoing developments and will update the post as events and circumstances continue to unfold.

To receive a notice when the DEFFT post on SOPA/PIPA is published, you can subscribe to the GCDEL Digital Era Thinkers Blog by clicking here or on the link on the upper left side of the website.

Comments

[Karin]

Nicely done. I have had a few emails this week imploring me to sign petitions and speak out against SOPA. But each of them present a one-sided argument and I require a balance before acting, which I am not seeing in any of these messages so far.

Is piracy an issue? Of course and sadly many of the people engaging in this activity would never contemplate stealing from a store or robbing a bank but don't believe it is wrong to steal other peoples work.

The entertainment industry has poured a substantial amount of money and lobbying effort into getting this pushed through in a way that best takes care of their interests but may infringe on the rights of others.

So, some modifications need to be made and that discussion needs to happen. I think that some of the panic effect we are seeing is based on a sense of being powerless if you do not have the deep pockets and lobby power of industries such as the Entertainment industry, which tends to leave people feeling that their option is protest in some form or another.

I would like to see some ideas for how and what should be changed in the current state of the document and a commitment that ideas presented will be fairly evaluated.

[Courtney Shelton Hunt, PhD]

Thanks for the thoughtful comment, Karin.

I actually see this as a conflict between two very powerful groups of individuals/organizations, with the government stuck in the middle and individuals being used as pawns. The negative political behavior of players like Google and Reddit and even Wikipedia was so evident to me yesterday, and their efforts to manipulate people into siding with them was so transparent. But, unfortunately, all too many people jumped on the protest bandwagon without realizing they were very likely getting played...

Now that the armchair protests are over, people will focus on other things and the lobbyists and legislators will go back to working on the law. Let's hope they find a way to collaborate and develop a solution that is as fair and balanced as possible.